And why the separation? Why push for more aggressive punishment for dogs and cats but not for horses, cattle, and poultry? The author of the legislation claims the original animal-cruelty law is written too broadly, that it makes it difficult to prosecute animal abusers. And yet, she is purposely writing out animals that ALSO deserve protection. It is confusing to have so much passion for only a select species and disregard the others. How does including livestock impede the process of charging abusers with animal-cruelty? How?
All animals deserve to be equally protected from abuse and neglect.
No comments:
Post a Comment